Aging and Storage

From Milk The Funk Wiki
Revision as of 23:38, 17 April 2017 by DanABA (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Overview of goals: https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1640076039353937/

BEGIN ROUGH DRAFT

(In progress) For this page, Aging and Storage will refer to the conditioning and aging of beer in its final package (bottle, keg, etc.). The conditioning process includes the changes that take the beer from its state at packing to the state in which it is intended to consumed. The term aging will be used on this page to discuss changes in the conditioned beer as it is aged further. Storage conditions and their advantages and disadvantages will be discussed. Aging of beer before packaging is discussed in various brewing pages on the wiki and will not be discussed here.

For simplicity, this page will mostly refer to what is going on in a bottle, but the same changes and processes occur in other package types, albeit at different rates, and 'bottle' can be replaced with 'keg' or another final package.

Best Practices for Storage

This could be an overview for customers, retailers, and distributors. The sections below can give more technical/detailed information.

See Techniques of Cellaring below for more information.

Bottle conditioning

(in progress)

Bottle conditioning is the process and changes that take a beer at packaging time to beer that is ready to drink. This can include the development of carbonation, microbial growth, development and reprocessing of off flavors, 'bottle shock' and other changes. Bottle conditioning, at least for the initial period where carbonation is generated, is typically carried out at warmer temperatures than extended aging after the conditioning is done.

Techniques of Cellaring

Cellaring, or extended age in the bottle once the beer is ready to drink, is common for many mixed fermentation beers. Cellaring is typically carried out at cooler temperatures.

Bottles vs Kegs

Corks vs Caps

Bottle Orientation

Chemical Changes

Effects of Oxygen

(This is probably the most important thing to talk about first.)

Acids and Esters

Cover microbiologically driven changes: over-attenuation, Brett expression under pressure, autoylsis

pH change in the bottle?

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002014002548

Phenols

Phenols are a large class of organic compounds. One way that phenols can be classified is by how many carbon atoms they include (see the phenols Wikipedia article). Examples of classes of phenols include the phenol (the simplest form of phenols with 6 carbon atoms), hydroxycinnamic acids (ferulic acid, caffeic acid, etc.), and polyphenols (multiple phenol structure units) [5][6]. Many phenols have an impact on beer aging or are impacted by beer aging.

Tannic Acid

Tannic acid is a sub-type of tannin. Tannic acid is generally extracted from four sources: Chinese gallnuts, Aleppo gallnuts (these both produce gallic acid), Sumac leaves, and Tara pods (produces quinic acid). Forms of tannic acid can also be extracted from oak galls (seeds from oak trees) and oak bark [7]. Tannic acid extracts are of interest to the brewing industry because they have been found to improve flavor stability through its free radical scavenging activity, bonding of the metals involved in beer staling (specifically iron ions and perhaps copper ions), and preventing oxidative degradation of lipids that produces the aldehyde trans-2-nonenal which is responsible for the papery flavor in stale beer. Tannic acid also increases colloidal stability (clarity) by binding with the proline-rich proteins that cause chill haze. The higher molecular weight tannic acids (Chinese gallnuts or Sumac leaves) will reduce chill haze by removing these proteins, while medium molecular weight tannic acids (Allepo gallnuts) can result in a stable haze for beer styles such as Belgian Wit or German Hefeweizen [8].

One study showed that adding gallic acid (tannic acid from Chinese or Aleppo gallnuts) during the mash and sparge water extended the shelf life of beer by reducing off-flavors such as trans-2-nonanol, the aldehyde responsible for the papery taste in stale beer. It also bound to proteins containing thiols that when oxidized during mashing can cause filtering and amylolytic issues, and settled them out during the mashing/boiling which made filtration easier. The study determined that the tannic acid did not have an impact on the saccharification rest or the soluble protein content. It did have a very slightly negative impact on yeast attenuation, however the addition of zinc to worts that had gallic acid added resolved the attenuation issue (it is thought that the gallic acid dropped the zinc out of solution since it binds with metals, and thus negatively impacted the yeast health) [9].

The sensory analysis showed that all of the fresh beers with or without gallic acid scored positively by tasters, although they preferred the beers with gallic acid because of their "fullness of taste and mouthfeel". After 5 days of storage at 40°C, the beers with gallic acid continued to rate high while the non-gallic acid beers began to show signs of staling (darker in color, cardboard flavor, slight sweetness, and a sharp unpleasant bitterness), and at 10 days the non-gallic beers were clearly more oxidized. These results were confirmed by storing the beers for one year at 4°C in the dark; the beers with gallic acid were always more preferred by tasters. The beers with gallic acid added during the mashing and sparging had better flavor stability, and better stability of hop compounds such as iso-alpha acids. They also had a higher polyphenol content from the malts (only hop extract was used, so the polyphenol content had to come from the malts). The lipoxygenase activity (LOX), which is the mechanism by which lipids are oxidized to create off-flavors, was also decreased in the beers with gallic acid added. They also found that the "Strecker" and "Maillard" derived aldehydes phenylacetaldehyde, furfural, benzaldehyde were reduced by the use of gallic acid (fatty-acid derived aldehydes were not reduced, but there is evidence that these are already present in malt and are not formed during the mashing process, unlike the previously mentioned aldehydes). Trans-2-nonenal (papery, cardboard staling flavors) was also reduced in beers brewed with gallic acid. The study found that mashing with gallic acid at 62°C and 5.3 pH had the most positive impacts on both flavor stability and the prevention on off-flavor development [9].

Products are now being sold such as Brewtan B that contain tannic acid without the impurities that can often be found in other commercial tannic acid products. This manufacturer claims that the product enhances clarity and colloidal stability, stabilizes hop bitterness, reduces aldehyde formation, and increases flavor and color stability over time. The dosage for this product is quite low at 1.5–4.0 g/hL [8]. Author Denny Conn of Experimental Brewing has noted that the use of Brewtan B increases the mouthfeel and flavor stability of beer. Recommended usage of Brewtan B is 1/4 teaspoon per 5 gallons of water [10].

Hop Compounds

IBU Degradation

Lightstruck

http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-40422000000100019&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2002.tb00568.x/abstract

http://www.professorbeer.com/articles/skunked_beer.html

Other Flavor and Non-flavor Compounds

Cover lifespan and effects of: tannins, THP (reference THP page), diacetyl, proteins, enzymes, gluten(?), effects of different levels of CO2.

Pediococcus 'sickness'

Microbial Survival and Changes

Cover what we know the about survival rate of different microbes, and connect them to the above sections if they have an impact.

See also Commercial Sour Beer Dregs Inoculation.

See Also

Additional Articles on MTF Wiki

MTF Facebook Discussions

External Resources

References