Difference between revisions of "Flemish Red-Brown Beer"

From Milk The Funk Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 46: Line 46:
 
==Microbes and Flavor Compounds==
 
==Microbes and Flavor Compounds==
 
===Introduction===
 
===Introduction===
While most beer styles are fermented using one culture of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' or ''S. pastorianus'', Flanders Red Ales are fermented with a [[Mixed Fermentation|mixed culture fermentation]].  At one brewery (presumed to be Rodenbach) studied by Martens et al., two beers were produced using mixed fermentation and blended together.  The first "light beer" was 11°P and was less acidic, while the second "heavy beer" was 13°P and served as an Old Ale if unblended.  Both beers were inoculated with an acid washed yeast slurry that was harvested from a previous fermentation of the "light beer", and contained about 5% lactic acid bacteria.  The fermentation of these beers followed three stages: 1. a seven day ethanol fermentation that is dominated by ''Saccharomyces'', 2. a four to five week lactic acid fermentation that was dominated by ''Lactobacilli'', and 3. a twenty to twenty-four month fermentation that was dominated by ''Brettanomyces'', ''Lactobacilli'', ''Pediococcus parvulus'', and acetic acid bacteria.  The development of the ''Brettanomyces'' and ''Pediococcus'' stage was similar to the development of these microbes in [[Lambic]] fermentation.  The "light beer" was never allowed to go through the third phase of fermentation, and was instead chilled to 0°C and then used to blend with previous batches of the "heavy beer" <ref name="Martens">[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1997.tb00939.x/abstract MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF A MIXED YEAST—BACTERIAL FERMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF A SPECIAL BELGIAN ACIDIC ALE.  H. Martens, D. Iserentant andH. Verachtert.  1997.]</ref>.  Interestingly, and perhaps frustratingly, Flanders red and brown ales have been the subject of published studies far less than Belgian lambic beers, so the following information is based off of the Martens et al. study (see reference).     
+
While most beer styles are fermented using one culture of ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' or ''S. pastorianus'', Flanders Red Ales are fermented with a [[Mixed Fermentation|mixed culture fermentation]].  At one brewery (presumed to be Rodenbach) studied by Martens et al., two beers were produced using mixed fermentation and blended together.  The first "light beer" was 11°P and was less acidic, while the second "heavy beer" was 13°P and served as an Old Ale if unblended.  Both beers were inoculated with an acid washed yeast slurry that was harvested from a previous fermentation of the "light beer", and contained about 5% lactic acid bacteria.  The fermentation of these beers followed three stages: 1. a seven day ethanol fermentation that is dominated by ''Saccharomyces'', 2. a four to five week lactic acid fermentation that was dominated by ''Lactobacilli'', and 3. a twenty to twenty-four month fermentation that was dominated by ''Brettanomyces'', ''Lactobacilli'', ''Pediococcus'', and acetic acid bacteria.  The development of the ''Brettanomyces'' and ''Pediococcus'' stage was similar to the development of these microbes in [[Lambic]] fermentation.  The "light beer" was never allowed to go through the third phase of fermentation, and was instead chilled to 0°C and then used to blend with previous batches of the "heavy beer" <ref name="Martens">[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1997.tb00939.x/abstract MICROBIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF A MIXED YEAST—BACTERIAL FERMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF A SPECIAL BELGIAN ACIDIC ALE.  H. Martens, D. Iserentant andH. Verachtert.  1997.]</ref>.  Interestingly, and perhaps frustratingly, Flanders red and brown ales have been the subject of published studies far less than Belgian lambic beers, so the following information is based off of the Martens et al. study (see reference).     
  
 
====Primary Fermentation====
 
====Primary Fermentation====
Line 62: Line 62:
  
 
====Comparison to Lambic====
 
====Comparison to Lambic====
Lambic is a similar beer produced in Belgium, but is fermented using [[Spontaneous Fermentation|spontaneous fermentation]].  Enterbacteria were not found in the brewery that Martens et al. studied since spontaneous fermentation was not used.  However, after the enterobacteria and primary ''Saccharomyces'' fermentation phases of lambic brewing are complete, the microbial populations of lambic and Flanders red/brown beers are similar during their aging processes.  Both beers display a dominance by ''Brettanomyces'' and ''Pediococcus'' during the aging phases.  Flanders Red Ales differ by having a large portion of the acid production performed by ''Lactobacilli'', where as in lambic the acid production is performed by ''Pediodoccus damnosus''.  Flanders Red Ales are also characterized by having ''P. parvulus'' instead of ''P. damnosus'', however Martens et al. noted that the two species have no clear difference as far as their effects on fermentation go.  Martens also noted that ''Brettanomyces'' began to disappear from old English Porter when the beer moved from wooden casks to metallic ones.  It is thought then that the wooden casks are vital to ''Brettanomyces'' in Flanders Red Ale brewing, perhaps due to the presence of ''Pediococci'', with which ''Brettanomyces'' "cooperates" to ferment dextrins in the beer during the aging phase <ref name="Martens"></ref>.
+
Lambic is a similar beer produced in Belgium, but is fermented using [[Spontaneous Fermentation|spontaneous fermentation]].  Enterbacteria were not found in the brewery that Martens et al. studied since spontaneous fermentation was not used.  However, after the enterobacteria and primary ''Saccharomyces'' fermentation phases of lambic brewing are complete, the microbial populations of lambic and Flanders red/brown beers are similar during their aging processes.  Both beers display a dominance by ''Brettanomyces'' and ''Pediococcus'' during the aging phases.  Flanders Red Ales differ by having a large portion of the acid production performed by ''Lactobacilli'', where as in lambic the acid production is performed by ''Pediodoccus damnosus''.  Flanders Red Ales are also characterized by having ''P. parvulus'' instead of ''P. damnosus'' (although this may have been misidentified; see Modern Analysis below), however Martens et al. noted that the two species have no clear difference as far as their effects on fermentation go.  Martens also noted that ''Brettanomyces'' began to disappear from old English Porter when the beer moved from wooden casks to metallic ones.  It is thought then that the wooden casks are vital to ''Brettanomyces'' in Flanders Red Ale brewing, perhaps due to the presence of ''Pediococci'', with which ''Brettanomyces'' "cooperates" to ferment dextrins in the beer during the aging phase <ref name="Martens"></ref>.
  
 
Belgian brewers have even married the Flanders Red Ale and Lambic by blending the two beers together.  The Flanders "acid beer" is fermented with cherries, and later on Lambic is added and the blend is allowed to referment in the bottle, creating something truly special <ref name="Verachtert"></ref>.
 
Belgian brewers have even married the Flanders Red Ale and Lambic by blending the two beers together.  The Flanders "acid beer" is fermented with cherries, and later on Lambic is added and the blend is allowed to referment in the bottle, creating something truly special <ref name="Verachtert"></ref>.
 +
 +
====Modern Analysis====
 +
A more recent study by Snaewaert et al. (see reference <ref name="snauwaert"></ref>) looked at the microbial and metabolic composition in the finished beer of the same brewery as Martens et al., as well as two other Flanders Red Ale breweries using "state of the art" DNA sequencing methods.  Three samples were analyzed (A, B, and C) from each brewery (1, 2, and 3).  As expected, there were both similarities and differences between the three breweries tested, as well as some differences between the individual beers from each brewery.  The bacterial populations for Breweries 1 and 3 were similar across all samples, whereas Brewery 2's samples had a larger difference in the three samples of its beers.  The yeast populations were similar between all samples for Brewery 1, whereas Breweries 2 and 3 had a larger difference in yeast populations between their three samples of beer <ref name="snauwaert"></ref>.  In summary, Brewery 1 (presumed to be Rodenbach) had similar populations of bacteria and yeast across all samples of their beer, whereas Brewery 3 only had similar populations of bacteria and not yeast across all samples of their beer, and Brewery 2 had the least amount of similarity in yeast and bacteria populations between their beer samples.   
 +
 +
Overall, the samples were mostly dominated by ''Pediococcus damnosus'' and ''Brettanomyces bruxellensis'', except for two samples of Brewery 2 that were dominated by ''Acetobacter'' (smaller amounts of ''Acetobacter'' in Brewery 1 were identified as ''Acetobacter pasteurianus'', and might be the same species in Brewery 2), and one sample from Brewery 2 and two samples from Brewery 3 that were dominated by an unidentified yeast.  Note that these findings conflicted with the findings of Martens et al. who identified ''P. parvulus'' as the dominating ''Pediococcus'' species.  These two species are closely related, and an explanation of this discrepancy between the two findings was never found.  ''Acetobacter'' numbers were higher in Brewery 1 and 2, and lower in Brewery 3, and were associated with the high acetic acid amounts found in the beers. Small numbers of ''Lactobacillus'' were found in all samples.  ''Weissella'' and ''Leuconostoc'' were found in some samples from Brewery 2, whereas only trace amounts of ''Wessella'' were found in one samples from Brewery 3.  A significant amount of ''Pichia'' yeast were found in two Brewery 2 samples, and trace amounts in other samples, as well as trace amounts of ''Candida'' and ''Kregervanrija'' yeasts <ref name="snauwaert"></ref>.
 +
 +
====Metabolic Composition====
 +
Snaewaert et al. also looked at the metabolic composition of finished beers in the three breweries.  Glucose was completely gone from the samples, but substantial concentrations of maltose, matotriose, tetraose, pentaose, and hexaose were still present.  This contrasts with the relatively high glucose and fructose found in finished bottled versions of these beers, which indicates that the beers are back-sweetened with young beer or with residual sugar or even possibly just some form of sugar at bottling time <ref name="snauwaert"></ref>.
 +
 +
Across the samples there was a presence of isoamyl alcohol (31-150mg/L) and isoamyl acetate (1.99-6 mg/L), and an absence of 2-phenyl ethanol and 2-phenylethyl acetate in both the matured beers and the bottles versions of those beers.
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==

Revision as of 13:58, 28 January 2016

(This page is in progress)

Flanders Red Ale is a classic beer style that is produced only by a small handful of breweries in West Flanders, Belgium today. Some American breweries aim to produce comparable beers [1]. These beers, red to brown in color, are characterized as being sour and sometimes sweet, with malt flavors and fruity complexity from the mixed fermentation and hints of oak. They have often been described as "wine-like", and have previously been distinguished from their close cousin, the Oud Bruin, brewed in East Flanders. Rodenbach is the most well known Flanders red producer [2]. Classic Belgian examples of Flemish red have been flash pasteurized or sterile filtered and are not alive in the bottle[3] (~35 minutes in) (also ref Mad Fermentationist dregs list).

BJCP Style

23B. Flanders Red Ale [4]

Overall Impression

A sour, fruity, red wine-like Belgian style ale with interesting supportive malt flavors and fruit complexity. The dry finish and tannin completes the mental image of a fine red wine.

Aroma

Complex fruity-sour profile with supporting malt that often gives a wine-like impression. Fruitiness is high, and reminiscent of black cherries, oranges, plums or red currants. There are often low to medium-low vanilla and/or chocolate notes. Spicy phenols can be present in low amounts for complexity. The sour aroma ranges from balanced to intense. Prominent vinegary acetic character is inappropriate. No hop aroma. Diacetyl is perceived only in very minor quantities, if at all, as a complementary aroma.

Appearance

Deep red, burgundy to reddish-brown in color. Good clarity. White to very pale tan head. Average to good head retention.

Flavor

Intense fruitiness commonly includes plum, orange, black cherry or red currant flavors. A mild vanilla and/or chocolate character is often present. Spicy phenols can be present in low amounts for complexity. Sour flavor ranges from complementary to intense, and can have an acidic bite. Malty flavors range from complementary to prominent, and often have a soft toasty-rich quality. Generally as the sour character increases, the malt character blends to more of a background flavor (and vice versa). No hop flavor. Restrained hop bitterness. An acidic, tannic bitterness is often present in low to moderate amounts, and adds an aged red wine-like character and finish. Prominent vinegary acetic character is inappropriate. Diacetyl is perceived only in very minor quantities, if at all, as a complementary flavor. Balanced to the malt side, but dominated by the fruity, sour, wine-like impression.

Mouthfeel

Medium bodied. Low to medium carbonation. Low to medium astringency, like a well-aged red wine, often with a prickly acidity. Deceivingly light and crisp on the palate although a somewhat sweet finish is not uncommon. Comments: Long aging and blending of young and well-aged beer often occurs, adding to the smoothness and complexity, though the aged product is sometimes released as a connoisseur’s beer. Known as the Burgundy of Belgium, it is more wine-like than any other beer style. The reddish color is a product of the malt although an extended, less-than-rolling portion of the boil may help add an attractive Burgundy hue. Aging will also darken the beer. The Flanders red is more acetic (but never vinegar-like) and the fruity flavors more reminiscent of a red wine than an Oud Bruin. Can have an apparent attenuation of up to 98%. History: An indigenous beer of West Flanders, typified by the products of the Rodenbach brewery, established in 1820 in West Flanders but reflective of earlier brewing traditions. The beer is aged for up to two years, often in huge oaken barrels which contain the resident bacteria necessary to sour the beer. It was once common in Belgium and England to blend old beer with young to balance the sourness and acidity found in aged beer. While blending of batches for consistency is now common among larger breweries, this type of blending is a fading art.

Characteristic Ingredients

A base of Vienna and/or Munich malts, light to medium cara-malts, and a small amount of Special B are used with up to 20% maize. Low alpha acid continental hops are commonly used (avoid high alpha or distinctive American hops). Saccharomyces, Lactobacillus and Brettanomyces (and acetobacter) contribute to the fermentation and eventual flavor.

Style Comparison

Less malty-rich than an Oud Bruin, often with more of a fruity-tart profile.

Vital Statistics

OG: 1.048 – 1.057 IBUs: 10 – 25 FG: 1.002 – 1.012 SRM: 10 – 16 ABV: 4.6 – 6.5%

Commercial Examples

Cuvée des Jacobins Rouge, Duchesse de Bourgogne, Rodenbach Grand Cru, Rodenbach Klassiek, Vichtenaar Flemish Ale

Tags

standard-strength, amber-color, top-fermenting, western-europe, traditional-style, sour-ale-family, balanced, sour, wood

Brewers Association Style

Belgian-Style Flanders Oud Bruin or Oud Red Ale [5]

Belgian-Style Flanders Oud Bruin or Oud Red Ales are copper to very dark. SRM/EBC color values can be misleading because the red spectrum of color is not accurately assessed using these procedures. Chill haze is acceptable at low serving temperatures. Some versions may be more highly carbonated and, when bottle conditioned, may appear cloudy when served. Roasted malt aromas including a cocoa-like character are acceptable at low levels. Brettanomyces produced aromas may be completely absent or very low. Fruity-ester aroma which is often cherry-like is apparent. Hop aroma is not perceived. Roasted malt flavors including a cocoa-like character are acceptable at low levels. A very low degree of malt sweetness may be present and in balance with the acidity produced by Lactobacillus activity. Hop flavor is not perceived. Hop bitterness is perceived to be very low to medium-low, though acidity and wood aging (if used) may mask higher bitterness unit levels. Overall balance is characterized by slight to strong lactic sourness, and with "Reds" sometimes a balanced degree of acetic acid. Brettanomyces produced flavors may be absent or very low. Fruity-ester flavor which is often cherry-like is apparent. Oak-like or woody characters may be pleasantly integrated into overall palate. Residual wine or distilled spirits flavors associated with used barrels should not be evident. Bottle conditioned versions are often blended old with new before packaging in order to create the brewer’s intended balance of characters. Body is described as a refreshing mouthfeel.

  • Original Gravity: (ºPlato) 1.044 - 1.056 (11 - 13.8)
  • Apparent Extract/Final Gravity: (ºPlato) 1.008 - 1.016 (2.1 - 4.1)
  • Alcohol by Weight (Volume): 3.80% - 5.20% (4.80% - 6.60%)
  • Bitterness (IBU): 5 - 18
  • Color SRM (EBC): 12 - 25 (24 - 50)

Microbes and Flavor Compounds

Introduction

While most beer styles are fermented using one culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or S. pastorianus, Flanders Red Ales are fermented with a mixed culture fermentation. At one brewery (presumed to be Rodenbach) studied by Martens et al., two beers were produced using mixed fermentation and blended together. The first "light beer" was 11°P and was less acidic, while the second "heavy beer" was 13°P and served as an Old Ale if unblended. Both beers were inoculated with an acid washed yeast slurry that was harvested from a previous fermentation of the "light beer", and contained about 5% lactic acid bacteria. The fermentation of these beers followed three stages: 1. a seven day ethanol fermentation that is dominated by Saccharomyces, 2. a four to five week lactic acid fermentation that was dominated by Lactobacilli, and 3. a twenty to twenty-four month fermentation that was dominated by Brettanomyces, Lactobacilli, Pediococcus, and acetic acid bacteria. The development of the Brettanomyces and Pediococcus stage was similar to the development of these microbes in Lambic fermentation. The "light beer" was never allowed to go through the third phase of fermentation, and was instead chilled to 0°C and then used to blend with previous batches of the "heavy beer" [6]. Interestingly, and perhaps frustratingly, Flanders red and brown ales have been the subject of published studies far less than Belgian lambic beers, so the following information is based off of the Martens et al. study (see reference).

Primary Fermentation

In the brewery studied by Martens et al., the "light beer" was inoculated with a harvested yeast slurry of multiple strains of S. cerevisiae at a rate of 8x106 CFU/mL, and the "heavy beer" was inoculated with 1x107 CFU/mL. Small numbers of Candida guillermondii and Candida datilla were reportedly in the yeast slurry, but their identification was questioned in the study and they were not found during primary fermentation. One interesting finding was that the S. cerevisiae strains used at this brewery formed sexual spores (ascospore), which is quite unusual for brewing yeasts. The yeast in the "heavy beer" grew slower (3 days) and reached an overall cell count that was lower than the "light beer", which reached maximum cell count in 2 days. Yeast slurries with more lactic acid bacteria are generally used to inoculate the "heavy beer", and this may retard the yeast growth in the "heavy beer". The harvested slurry is always taken from the "light beer", which may be less adapted to the fermentation of the "heavy beer". Also, after 1 week the yeast flocculated and settled out better in the "light beer" than they did in the "heavy beer". Although lactic acid bacteria were in the yeast slurry, their growth only started to appear after 4 days into the primary fermentation. No enterobacteria or acetic acid bacteria were found during this first phase of fermentation [6].

The lactic acid bacteria found in yeast slurry were 18 strains of L. delbruekii ssp delbruekii and 12 strains of L. delbruekii ssp bulgaricus. Small amounts of Pediococcus were also identified in the slurry, but were impossible to isolate with enrichment until they were found in the primary fermentation. During primary fermentation, one strain of L. platnarum, two strains of L. brevis, and one strain of Pediococcus parvulus were identified [6].

Secondary Fermentation

After the 7 days of the primary fermentation, the beer was transferred to a secondary fermenter and remained there for four to five weeks. Both the yeast and bacteria populations saw a decline during the transfer, and then a small and gradual growth in secondary with the final yeast count being 4.3x105 in the "heavy beer" and 6.4x103 in the "light beer". Lactic acid bacteria grew much faster and became dominate in the "light beer", whereas in the "heavy beer" they grew more slowly and yeast remained the dominate microbe. This is explained by there being more sugars in the "heavy beer", which gave the yeast the advantage. Acetic acid bacteria were still not detected during secondary fermentation [6]. Lactic acid begins to be produced as well during secondary fermentation, with about a third of it being L-lactic acid and two thirds of it being D-lactic acid [7].

During secondary fermentation, L. delbruekii ssp delbruekii strains dominated over the other lactic acid bacteria found. Additional strains of L. plantarum and L. coryneformis, and an additional strain of L. brevis was found in the "heavy beer". Other than the dominating L. delbruekii ssp delbruekii strains, only a few strains of L. brevis were found in the "light beer" [6]. The "light beer" appeared to have a a smaller diversity of microbes.

Tertiary Fermentation

The same study by Martens et al. looked at two casks during the third fermentation, where the "heavy beer" beer was transferred from the secondary fermentation vessel to age for two years. At the beginning of the third phase of fermentation, Saccharomyces cell counts began to drop while the appearance of Brettanomyces began. After 10 weeks in the casks, Lactobacilli greatly decreased, giving rise to strains of Pediococcus parvulus. After 12 weeks for Cask A and 18 weeks for Cask B, the beer no longer contained Saccharomyces, and Brettanomyces dominated. Specifically, B. lambicus (now classified as a strain of B. bruxellensis [1]) and B. bruxellensis were the dominate species, but much smaller counts of B. intermedius (now classified as B. anomala) and B. custersianus were also found. The Brettanomyces species continued to be the primary microorganisms for 36 weeks in Cask A and 50 weeks in Cask B. After this time period, P. parvulus began to dominate. Acetic acid bacteria also began to make an appearance in the casks, being detected at 27 weeks in Cask A and 40 weeks in Cask B. The exact numbers of the acetic acid bacteria were not reported by this study since they mostly grow on the surface of the beer inside the cask, and possibly on the walls of the cask where diffused oxygen could reach them more easily, and samples were not taken from these sections of the casks. The difference in the time periods for the microbial populations was determined to be affected by the casks themselves, which differed in age, size, and possibly different microbe colonization inside them before they were filled [6]. During the third fermentation phase, lactic acid greatly increases from ~600 ppm to ~4500 ppm after 35 weeks, and then slowly increases to ~5200 ppm at 60 weeks, at which time L-lactic is only slightly less (~48%) than D-lactic acid [7]. Acetic acid levels reached 1600 ppm by the end of the third phase. The final pH of the "heavy beer" is around 3.2-3.5 [1].

Comparison to Lambic

Lambic is a similar beer produced in Belgium, but is fermented using spontaneous fermentation. Enterbacteria were not found in the brewery that Martens et al. studied since spontaneous fermentation was not used. However, after the enterobacteria and primary Saccharomyces fermentation phases of lambic brewing are complete, the microbial populations of lambic and Flanders red/brown beers are similar during their aging processes. Both beers display a dominance by Brettanomyces and Pediococcus during the aging phases. Flanders Red Ales differ by having a large portion of the acid production performed by Lactobacilli, where as in lambic the acid production is performed by Pediodoccus damnosus. Flanders Red Ales are also characterized by having P. parvulus instead of P. damnosus (although this may have been misidentified; see Modern Analysis below), however Martens et al. noted that the two species have no clear difference as far as their effects on fermentation go. Martens also noted that Brettanomyces began to disappear from old English Porter when the beer moved from wooden casks to metallic ones. It is thought then that the wooden casks are vital to Brettanomyces in Flanders Red Ale brewing, perhaps due to the presence of Pediococci, with which Brettanomyces "cooperates" to ferment dextrins in the beer during the aging phase [6].

Belgian brewers have even married the Flanders Red Ale and Lambic by blending the two beers together. The Flanders "acid beer" is fermented with cherries, and later on Lambic is added and the blend is allowed to referment in the bottle, creating something truly special [7].

Modern Analysis

A more recent study by Snaewaert et al. (see reference [1]) looked at the microbial and metabolic composition in the finished beer of the same brewery as Martens et al., as well as two other Flanders Red Ale breweries using "state of the art" DNA sequencing methods. Three samples were analyzed (A, B, and C) from each brewery (1, 2, and 3). As expected, there were both similarities and differences between the three breweries tested, as well as some differences between the individual beers from each brewery. The bacterial populations for Breweries 1 and 3 were similar across all samples, whereas Brewery 2's samples had a larger difference in the three samples of its beers. The yeast populations were similar between all samples for Brewery 1, whereas Breweries 2 and 3 had a larger difference in yeast populations between their three samples of beer [1]. In summary, Brewery 1 (presumed to be Rodenbach) had similar populations of bacteria and yeast across all samples of their beer, whereas Brewery 3 only had similar populations of bacteria and not yeast across all samples of their beer, and Brewery 2 had the least amount of similarity in yeast and bacteria populations between their beer samples.

Overall, the samples were mostly dominated by Pediococcus damnosus and Brettanomyces bruxellensis, except for two samples of Brewery 2 that were dominated by Acetobacter (smaller amounts of Acetobacter in Brewery 1 were identified as Acetobacter pasteurianus, and might be the same species in Brewery 2), and one sample from Brewery 2 and two samples from Brewery 3 that were dominated by an unidentified yeast. Note that these findings conflicted with the findings of Martens et al. who identified P. parvulus as the dominating Pediococcus species. These two species are closely related, and an explanation of this discrepancy between the two findings was never found. Acetobacter numbers were higher in Brewery 1 and 2, and lower in Brewery 3, and were associated with the high acetic acid amounts found in the beers. Small numbers of Lactobacillus were found in all samples. Weissella and Leuconostoc were found in some samples from Brewery 2, whereas only trace amounts of Wessella were found in one samples from Brewery 3. A significant amount of Pichia yeast were found in two Brewery 2 samples, and trace amounts in other samples, as well as trace amounts of Candida and Kregervanrija yeasts [1].

Metabolic Composition

Snaewaert et al. also looked at the metabolic composition of finished beers in the three breweries. Glucose was completely gone from the samples, but substantial concentrations of maltose, matotriose, tetraose, pentaose, and hexaose were still present. This contrasts with the relatively high glucose and fructose found in finished bottled versions of these beers, which indicates that the beers are back-sweetened with young beer or with residual sugar or even possibly just some form of sugar at bottling time [1].

Across the samples there was a presence of isoamyl alcohol (31-150mg/L) and isoamyl acetate (1.99-6 mg/L), and an absence of 2-phenyl ethanol and 2-phenylethyl acetate in both the matured beers and the bottles versions of those beers.

See Also

Additional Articles on MTF Wiki

External Resources

References